So, I guess the Silly Season is really officially underway now with what looks like a classic case of feeding frenzy beginning to build. Blogs and websites have been running speculation all day that John McCain’s VP pick from out of nowhere, Sarah Palin is actually the grandmother of the child she says his her number 5. The very liberal leaning Daily Kos has picked it up and his trumpeting it across the Internets, (or a series of tubes as Alaska’s Ted Stevens would say) and I’m sure it will soon quickly roll out into the mainstream media.
Why? The media doesn’t like it when they aren’t a part of the process, and McCain pulled a fast one by picking Palin. She was basically an unknown, and the media will most likely be anxious to jump on this as if to say, “you should have let us help vet her.”
The Daily Kos,and other reports,base their evidence on several things”
- Pain didn’t announce her pregnancy until she was 7 months along. Even her staff didn’t know.
- Her daughter was removed from school for an extended period of time with the reason being stated as an extended bout of mono.
- Palin apparently gave a speech at a Governor’s convention in Texas while supposedly leaking amniotic fluid, then flew back to Alaska and gave birth after driving back to her small town hospital instead of in the state capital.
- Pictures during the period before and after she announced her condition don’t appear to show her typically pregnant, and some pictures from the time period in question have been removed or moved around on the State of Alaska’s website.
While the evidence as is being presented might smack of a family coverup of a family problem, no one really knows anything at this point. That said, assume there is substance to the speculation, here’s the “history repeats itself” rub.
Given Sarah Palin’s ardent pro-life stance, she would have gathered far more sympathy and support had she come clean about the situation instead of trying to pretend she could hide from the facts. No one would have batted an eye, except the most voracious of partisans. Yes, you can say she was trying to protect her daughter. But while that is noble, like everything else in a coverup, if true, it will backfire big time.
Recent Comments