The discussion started almost after the hype began to diminish. How does Origami/UMPC play towards the business community, given Microsoft/Intel's consumer focus? Rob and Dennis of GottaBeMobile have chimed in. Spencer chimed in on Tablet PC Buzz, and it has been bandied around quite a bit. James Kendrick has also added to the mix and one of his podcast listeners chimed in with an interesting comment that he has blogged on jkOnTheRun.
While the discussion is more than worthwhile, I believe it has nothing to do with the device itself and how it will be used. It'll get plenty of use in both the consumer and business markets. Anyone who can't see the potential business use of these devices is hoping against hope that the UMPC won't water down the existing Tablet PC market for the business sector. You don't think Motion and OQO aren't nervous? We're talking price point here.
But like most things these days, the marketing whiz kids have made a mess of things. We've all had some fun with the name game thing. Origami vs. UMPC. One's cool, the other is not. Why not keep the codename Origami if you're aiming at the Consumer Market? Why are the "official sites" still carrying the name Origami?
It's still early in the game. Heck, we've only got one OEM taking orders as of today. But I'm betting that we'll see Origami/UMPCs on both sides of the consumer/business spectrums. If you can hook up the peripherals and operate the way jk is talking to a device that costs under $1000 as opposed to a device that costs $2000 what would you choose?
Recent Comments